Hypercerts - retroactive impact funding - workflow of evaluation - incentives

[mars]

Meanwhile in Hypercerts Telegram:

• Evaluate usefulness of existing attestation & evaluation protocols · Issue #439 · hypercerts-org/hypercerts · GitHub

• Permissionless Rating - Prime Rating

• https://devpost.com/software/cap-climate-attestation-protocol

• The Future of Distributed MRV 🔭 📱| Roundup #52

• https://mrv.earth/

@mars

I think Kleros can safely handle cases in region of $1m at stake.

Once $1m cases are regular, there will be more robust ecosystem of jurors, more robust incentives. I still believe that the suggested workflow is sensible / reasonable / practical / decent / acceptable / probably one of the best option available as of now:

@mars

• Yes, correct, the overall impact assessment is "reasonable"
• No, wrong, there are some issues