Hypercerts - retroactive impact funding - workflow of evaluation - incentives

Yes, and…

Yes, but…

I’m not disagreeing with you. In fact I believe you are mentioned something truly valuable, only a few people can grasp.

Level 1: Not that many people know Web3
Level 2: Not that many people know Kleros
Level 3: Not that many people know the incentives of the jurors
Level 4: Not that many people know the incentives of the jurors and when it can go astray

Welcome to Level 5

Leonardo Di Caprio Inception GIF - Leonardo Di Caprio Inception GIFs

We need to go deeper…

Jurors vote for the majority.

  • you get what you incentivize
  • show me the incentive and I will tell you the outcome

The incentive is to behave coherently, therefore they will vote for the majority, full stop.

I tried to come up with an example where majority is not right = … … … … … … … (please come up with ideas here)

There is an incentive to be the “unpopular juror”:

  1. Vote as a juror against the majority
  2. Case goes to the next round
  3. Your decision is upheld
  4. Financial incentive :moneybag::moneybag::moneybag:

NOTE: If you are that “unpopular juror” - you should publish your thinking process, upload it as evidence, convince others.

(Kleros has no KYC, same human can be a juror, plaintiff, defendant, using multiple ETH addresses = feature not a bug)

So far, there was not a single case that was obviously wrong. There were some cases:

  • technicalities
  • nuances
  • wording
  • loopholes
  • multiple possible interpretations
  • astroturfing and attempts to spread misinformation

(and Kleros remained resilient at all times)

When I look at FTX SBF legal fees, I think Kleros is 100x more cost-efficient and 10x faster.

(gathering evidence, voting, funding appeal = it takes a few weeks)

(interesting thread about one of the biggest, most controversial cases)

(LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO)

Another controversial case: #82 GRID PLUS Badge – Challenge | Heliast

It was about 3rd party audit. Project form ConsenSys ecosystem and ConsenSys audit wasn’t considered 3rd party.

More thoughts:

My forum post about definition of “fairness”:

I want jurors to consider what is fair, not just coherent.

Director of resaerch:

More Discussion

Telegram link: Telegram: Contact @kleros

There are people would love more Level 5 discussions :brain:

2 Likes